Your colleague accurately captured the argument made by the article – The argument was summarised in a way that was easily understandable – The plan set out the key elements of the article and accurately represented the structure of the article. – Did the plan contain too much or too little information? – You should also comment briefly on how the plan you are reviewing compares to the plan you drew up. What do these differences reveal to you about how you interpreted this article? Does reviewing your colleagues plan help you better understand the article? Does it change your interpretation of the article?