Give the two generations names that you feel reflects their experience. Explain why you chose that name.

Give the two generations names that you feel reflects their experience. Explain why you chose that name.
Watch the documentary available online here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVG2cX107KA The video may continue automatically for the entire series, but you only need to watch episode 1, which is one hour and eleven minutes long. Answer the questions below in a Word document. Each answer should be about a full page (double-spaced, one inch margins, Times New Roman 12 point font) of insightful commentary–just because you write a page does not automatically mean you get an A). If you fail to meet the length requirements, you will get a zero. Seriously. 1. Discuss two examples of violence on the part of the Pilgrims that were featured in the documentary. Was the violence justified? Why do you think Pilgrims are popularly remembered only for the first Thanksgiving, and not their full and actual history? 2. In modern American, we like to make a big deal of about the unique generational experiences of each individual generation. For example, Millennials, Gen-Xers, and Boomers are considered to be shaped by very different events and social changes. Looking at the time period and people examined in the documentary, identify TWO different “generations” that you see. You can group Europeans and Native Americans differently or put them in the same generation, its up to you. Then, do the following: a. Give the two generations names that you feel reflects their experience. Explain why you chose that name. For example “Baby Boomers,” got their name because they were all born in the population boom after WWII. Events in the documentary may help you give the generations you identify their names. b. Next, define at least TWO distinct events that shaped EACH generation, in your view. c. Finally, define at least TWO skills or values EACH generation has. 3. Jill Lapore and Colin G. Calloway are two historians who were interviewed in the documentary. Do a Google search of one them, and maybe check Amazon too. Go a little deep on this, as the documentary is almost a decade old. Not all talking heads on TV are equally qualified. What makes a historian qualified to speak in a documentary like this? Is the historian you chose qualified to speak in this documentary? Why or why not?